arliss: (stupid)
([personal profile] arliss May. 17th, 2004 02:24 am)
There was discussion elsewhere about reading one's work aloud, for an audience. Which is different than reading one's work aloud to check pacing. When I work on a novel, I will read a new chapter aloud, walking. The practice checks for rhythm and pace, and has been a valuable tool for me.

But reading one's work for others is different. I tend not to read long fiction aloud. I'll do an excerpt of a nonfiction piece, or a very short story, or a scene from a longer story. But poems are usually best. And to get past that quaver in the voice, that constriction in the throat and the shaking hands, I recite my "party piece." It's one of the few, perhaps the only, poem I've written that rhymes end lines, and is in recognizable meter. It was written to exorcize a personal bugaboo, but it is both humorous and spooky, and generally gets a good reception.

Having used the poem to break the ice, and having gotten a bit of positive reception, I can go on to other things, given time. Of course if there is no positive response, I just slink quietly away in search of hemlock.

From: [identity profile] debg.livejournal.com


I'm always amazed, on the practical level, how many people I know have worries or issues about public speaking. I understand it on the emotional level, mind you, but I love public reading. Being a showboat helps, I guess.

My big worry about reading aloud is whether I'm speeding up. I speak, and read, very quickly, and with a listening audience, it's just as you said: pacing and rhythm are needed.
.

Profile

arliss: (Default)
arliss

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags